Mount Pleasant DC Forum Forum Index Mount Pleasant DC Forum
Discussion about the Mount Pleasant Neighborhood
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Robbery statistics, PSAs 301-302-303-304

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Mount Pleasant DC Forum Forum Index -> PSA 408 Meetings
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jack



Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 4399
Location: 19th & Lamont

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:01 pm    Post subject: Robbery statistics, PSAs 301-302-303-304 Reply with quote

For the PSA 302 meeting, I prepared the attached document, showing charts of robbery rates in the several area PSAs. Robberies in PSAs 302 (Columbia Heights North), 303 (Adams Morgan), and 304 (Columbia Heights South) are up modestly. There was a sharp decrease in robberies in PSAs 302 and 303 last winter, which makes the return to "normal" rates a relatively large increase. But only in 301 (Mount Pleasant) is there a drastic increase above historical robbery rates, to three times the average over the 2004-2005 period. Of course, that does merely lift our robbery rate to the rates already experienced by our adjacent PSAs.

The PSA 302 meeting was much more effective than our PSA 301 meetings. Instead of a formal, audience-question and MPD-answer session, the discussion was much more informal and inclusive, with substantial contributions from members of the audience, not just questions. A major topic was the shortage of recreational facilities for area youth, contributing to their getting into trouble on the streets. With juvenile robberies becoming an area plague, we've got to find ways to deal with our teenagers. One MPD officer provided a remarkable description of the division of Columbia Heights into three mutually hostile African-American gang areas, such that a recreational facility in one area would be inaccessible to gang members from other areas. One member of the audience, who works in the business of recreational facilities for inner cities, noted that it is not sufficient simply to build a facility and expect the youth to come; one has to actively work with troubled young men and change their mind-sets, just to get them into such activities.

This was "community policing" at its best: identify a problem, and work out ways to address the problem. A number of suggestions were provided for recreational sites.

Anything Columbia Heights does to mitigate its problem of troubled young men will also reduce our crime problems here. Much of the robbery, burglary, and theft in Mount Pleasant is done by men coming here from east of 16th Street.

-- Jack



Robberies.301 304.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  Robberies.301 304.pdf
 Filesize:  12.07 KB
 Downloaded:  526 Time(s)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
tjk



Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does merely lift our rates? So, I suppose we should be trying to surpass our adjoining PSAs in robberies?
I was at the PSA 301 meeting and I found a decent amount of give and take between the police and the audience. Community policing in Mt. Pleasant is apparent in programs like Operation Live Link the officers who came for a browse at the Ingleside Terrace yard sale today. It doesn't help a neighborhood when those elected to represent the community take an openly hostile and aggressive stand against a police force that is overall very engaged and community friendly.

_________________
Todd Kutyla
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
azzariti



Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:08 pm    Post subject: setting the bar Reply with quote

Jack, why do you insist on using Columbia Heights as Mt. Pleasant's standard of measurement? That's complacency at its best. Can we not set the bar higher?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jack



Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 4399
Location: 19th & Lamont

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:30 pm    Post subject: Re: setting the bar Reply with quote

azzariti wrote:
Jack, why do you insist on using Columbia Heights as Mt. Pleasant's standard of measurement? That's complacency at its best. Can we not set the bar higher?


Quite the opposite of "complacency"; I tried to raise the issue at the 301 meeting, that a sudden tripling of our robbery rate was a matter to take very seriously. There wasn't much of a response, much to my surprise.

As for the comparison to Columbia Heights: I worry about our entire area, not just about Mount Pleasant. In fact, given that most of our robberies occur in the eastern third of the neighborhood, the crime rate in that area is very high, higher than the average in Columbia Heights.

I argue repeatedly that we should put more emphasis on tracking down robbers and closing robberies by arrest. The detective at the 301 meeting said that he had five people working robberies in 3D. There have been over 1000 robberies in 3D so far this year. That sounds to me like serious understaffing of the effort to reduce robberies. It's not surprising that our robbery closure rate is well below the norm for large cities.

Robbers don't stop doing robberies until they are stopped. We've got to do better at tracking down robbers after their robberies. That's easily the best way to reduce the robbery rate throughout the area.

-- Jack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
brett



Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 214
Location: MtP

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:40 pm    Post subject: Re: setting the bar Reply with quote

jack wrote:
Quite the opposite of "complacency"; I tried to raise the issue at the 301 meeting, that a sudden tripling of our robbery rate was a matter to take very seriously. There wasn't much of a response, much to my surprise.


Given the way you railed against the new MPD leadership in our PSA, do you really find that surprising.

I was also there and thought there was quite a bit of give and take. The group from the Columbia Heights Youth Center dominated the discussion - but I think that was productive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jack



Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 4399
Location: 19th & Lamont

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:50 pm    Post subject: Re: setting the bar Reply with quote

brett wrote:
Given the way you railed against the new MPD leadership in our PSA, do you really find that surprising.


I have no complaints about "the new MPD leadership". I think Lt Sledge is a vast improvement over Lt Ewell, and I think Inspector Burke is very good, though no one could measure up to the standard set by Inspector Groomes.

I will continue to press for better MPD performance in the closing of robberies. The current rate of closing robberies by arrest is 14%, well below the MPD target of 18%, and further below the big-city average of 23%. We cannot be "complacent" with these statistics.

The MPD is listening. The new policy of offering rewards for information leading to the arrest and conviction of robbers is a substantial improvement. I still think we need more detectives working this area. Five detectives in 3D, where there have been over 1000 robberies so far this year alone, just isn't enough.

-- Jack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Mount Pleasant DC Forum Forum Index -> PSA 408 Meetings All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group